Indonesia's Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) has been called into question once again over its data accuracy, this time due to concerns raised by the mayor of South Kalimantan, Bahlil Lahadalia.
In a recent video circulating on social media, Lahadalia was seen urging the public to believe in the data provided by the BPS. He emphasized that the statistics are accurate and reliable, and that he encourages everyone to trust them.
However, this statement has sparked debate among experts and citizens alike, who question why the BPS needs to be reminded of its own credibility. "It's unacceptable for a government official to suggest that we need to believe in the data without any concrete evidence," said one critic.
The issue at hand is the accuracy of the BPS' data, particularly when it comes to demographic information. In recent years, there have been several instances where discrepancies between BPS data and other sources have come to light.
Lahadalia's statement has raised questions about the government's handling of data and its transparency. While the mayor's intention may be to reassure the public, his approach has only served to fuel skepticism.
The BPS has a responsibility to provide accurate and reliable data, and it is essential that they take steps to address concerns over their credibility. The public deserves better than to be asked to blindly trust statistics without any evidence to support them.
As one expert noted, "The government needs to be more transparent about their data collection methods and ensure that the information provided is accurate and reliable." Until then, the public will continue to question the BPS' data and demand better from our government.
In a recent video circulating on social media, Lahadalia was seen urging the public to believe in the data provided by the BPS. He emphasized that the statistics are accurate and reliable, and that he encourages everyone to trust them.
However, this statement has sparked debate among experts and citizens alike, who question why the BPS needs to be reminded of its own credibility. "It's unacceptable for a government official to suggest that we need to believe in the data without any concrete evidence," said one critic.
The issue at hand is the accuracy of the BPS' data, particularly when it comes to demographic information. In recent years, there have been several instances where discrepancies between BPS data and other sources have come to light.
Lahadalia's statement has raised questions about the government's handling of data and its transparency. While the mayor's intention may be to reassure the public, his approach has only served to fuel skepticism.
The BPS has a responsibility to provide accurate and reliable data, and it is essential that they take steps to address concerns over their credibility. The public deserves better than to be asked to blindly trust statistics without any evidence to support them.
As one expert noted, "The government needs to be more transparent about their data collection methods and ensure that the information provided is accurate and reliable." Until then, the public will continue to question the BPS' data and demand better from our government.