How and why CBC News will adjust its 9/11 language guidance

The recent leak of an excerpt from CBC News’ internal language guide has sparked a contentious debate about how news organizations should refer to the 9/11 attacks. As journalists grapple with attribution, it’s clear that the line between clarity and sensitivity is increasingly blurred.

CBC News has decided to adjust its language guidance to remove the requirement for direct attribution when describing the 9/11 attacks as terrorism. This decision is a welcome step towards greater transparency and accuracy in reporting. It acknowledges that, after two decades, the motivations behind the attacks are no longer a subject of debate.

The principle of attribution has long been a cornerstone of responsible journalism, ensuring that news organizations attribute causes and motivations to officials and experts accurately and contextually. However, this principle can sometimes be misapplied or taken too far, leading to unnecessary obstacles for clear communication.

In reporting on 9/11, CBC News has consistently applied the principle of attribution, allowing readers to understand the complexities of the tragedy without minimizing its significance or impact. The leaked excerpt, taken out of context, created unnecessary confusion and sparked concerns about CBC’s commitment to accuracy.

The controversy surrounding CBC News’ language guidance is also a reminder that journalistic practices must evolve in response to changing times and circumstances. As new acts of violence occur, news organizations must adapt their reporting to provide clarity without compromising sensitivity. This balancing act requires a nuanced understanding of the complex relationships between language, context, and audience.

In revising its language guidance, CBC News is not only addressing the specific concerns raised by the leak but also reaffirming its commitment to clear and accurate reporting. As news organizations continue to report on complex events, they must prioritize transparency, accountability, and a willingness to adapt in the face of changing circumstances.

For 9/11’s 25th anniversary, CBC News has pledged extensive coverage that will reflect on the tragedy with respect and thoughtfulness. This commitment is a testament to the enduring impact of the attacks and the ongoing need for thoughtful journalism. As news organizations strive to capture the complexities of our rapidly changing world, they must prioritize clarity without sacrificing sensitivity.

Ultimately, CBC News’ decision to adjust its language guidance is not about revising history but about ensuring that reporting on 9/11 remains accurate, respectful, and accessible to readers.